AI Visibility
Report.
For Claude · ChatGPT · Gemini · DeepSeek · Perplexity.
Does ChatGPT know your brand?
We ask Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Perplexity 10 buyer-intent questions across four categories — each question checked three times for consistency — and score each engine separately. Together these engines capture ~94% of worldwide generative-AI website traffic (Similarweb, Jan 2026). If you pass a domain, we also test whether AI crawlers (ClaudeBot, GPTBot, Google-Extended, PerplexityBot) can actually reach your site. Free. Result emailed.
Five LLMs. Ten prompts. Three runs. Per-engine scores.
Claude · ChatGPT · Gemini · DeepSeek · Perplexity.
Together they capture ~94% of worldwide generative-AI website traffic — ChatGPT alone reaches 900M weekly users (OpenAI, Feb 2026); Gemini sits at 400M MAU; Claude, DeepSeek and Perplexity round out the rest (Similarweb Global AI Tracker, Jan 2026). Each engine has its own training data, ranking quirks, and citation behaviour. We query all five in parallel with web search enabled — and score them separately, not as a single blended number. The same brand can be a B in Claude and an F in Gemini, and the report shows you exactly which.
Industry · niche · brand-named · specialty.
3 industry (broad "who do you recommend"), 2 niche (specific use cases for your category), 2 brand-named ("reputation of", "alternatives to"), 3 specialty (differentiator-axis probes tuned to your industry). We don't blend categories — each gets its own score so you see where you're strong and where you're not.
Same brand, same score, every time.
We ask each question three times and only count your brand as mentioned when it appears in the majority of the runs. This kills the random-feeling answers single-shot AI tools produce. We match your brand name exactly (no AI judging AI), so the score is reproducible — run it again next week, same number.
Mentioned ≠ recommended. The report tries to show the difference.
For every mention we record where in the response it appears (first third / middle / last third — deterministic, no LLM). A second cheap-model pass attempts to classify the sentiment of the mention (positive / neutral / hedged / negative) and extract every brand name in the response so we can show you who got cited in your place. These passes can fail individually — when they do the badge is just absent rather than wrong. If you pass a domain, we also probe whether AI crawlers (Claude-User, GPTBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended) can actually reach your site, since a blocked crawler eliminates you from that engine's real-time answers regardless of brand authority.
Free. 1 check per email per 30 days.
Result emailed so you can re-open it later (lives 30 days). For weekly auto-tracking, multi-brand monitoring, sentiment trend lines, and the co-citation network graph — that's the paid Pro tier (coming soon).
Now check your AI visibility.
5 LLMs queried in parallel: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Perplexity. Takes 25–45 seconds. Result emailed so you can re-open it later.
Takes 60–120 seconds on first run. We query 5 AI engines in parallel, then check each answer for competitor mentions and how your brand is talked about. Web search is on.
Check your inbox to resume
We sent a verification link to your email. Click it and your AI Visibility check picks up exactly where it left off.
If it doesn't arrive in 60 seconds, check spam. The link works for 30 days.
Other free tools that fit the same workflow.
A check is the diagnosis.
Visibility is the project.
Foreground runs AI-search optimization sprints — schema for citations, content shaped for retrieval, llms.txt, brand-disambiguation, and the technical groundwork that makes ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek mention your brand more often. The check is what we do for free. The work is what we do for clients.
Reach us at info@foreground.agency
or visit foreground.agency/contact